Hello,
I recently got back into origami after a very long layoff ( 7- 8 years!)
and am enjoying it a lot - Are there any models which you would consider "essential" to fold - ive already done the kawasaki rose
First, I would like to disagree with the comments above.
I, for one, do not think that ANY super-complex fold is a must-fold. If someone could explain to me why any of Satoshi Kamiya's work is "must-fold", I would be delighted to know.
In fact, in my opinion, "must folds" are folds that EVERY paper-folder should have in his repertoire, whether (s)he is an advanced folder or not. These are "good", classic folds. In my opinion the list includes:
(*) Yoshizawa's butterfly from a waterbomb base
(*) Fujimoto's cube (again - it has this most wonderful folding sequence).
(*) The Chinese Junk
(*) The classic crane and/or the flapping bird.
(*) Kawasaki's rose
(*) Sonobe cube
(*) Omega star
the f-22 by Rafa Hendrix is also a necessity. The model is simple (the most complicated fold is an internal crimp) and ends up 3D.I will review the model soon.
Rather than trying to pick models, I think it'd be easier -- and better representative of the breadth of origami -- to know or have folded at least one model by particular well-known folders that best exemplify each folder's particular style and approach to folding. Granted there will be a lot of convergence, particularly these days, and this would be an ever increasing list as new folders become well known, but...
Alternatively, one could pick one representative of each style, regardless of authorship. I like this option less, myself, because I don't like modular or other compound origami models, but it could be a choice!
I expect that traditional models are a must, too, to exemplify the evolution of origami through time. Actually, that could be another option, too: know/fold models exemplifying something typical of (or several models within a range) a particular time period.
hm I want to know what would be a list of any kind of origami to show the variety of origami. HankSimon models are only "normal" origami models without tess. and modulars for example. Good would be the most famous model of every kind.
There is no such thing like the most famous model of each kind.
If you want to represent different folding styles you have to define those styles first.
For a speech at school I chose the following topics to show the diversity of Origami: purism (cuts, glue,...), different starting shapes (square, rectangle, triangle, hexagon...), modular (polyhedra, boxes, animals,...), multi piece (Halle), wetfolding (tools, results,...), tessellations (regular, irregular, representational,...), crumpling (Floderer), curvigami (dry tension folding). There are of course several more techniques and criteria to differentiate Origami.
To represent those styles I'd go after availability. I know for example that there is no diagram for "Attack of the Kraken" available so if I want to represent a ship I'd maybe take the full rigged ship by Patricia Crawford, that also is a very nice model but with easily available diagrams.