Page 1 of 1
Chinese modulars help please
Posted: August 4th, 2005, 10:15 am
by thegman20
Hi. I'm new here and really like this forum so far. I'm kinda into chinese modular origami right now...
I need your help on what is the size of each modular? I mean the size of the little paper before it folds...
And what folding is better? :
http://dev.origami.com/diagram_load.cfm ... inunit.pdf
OR THIS?
http://www.opane.com/opane/swan.html (also good instructions)
Thanks!
Posted: August 4th, 2005, 7:47 pm
by origami_8
thegman20 wrote:what folding is better?
That depends on you. Try both and find out which one is easier for you, the finished result is nearly the same and after assembling nobody will see the difference.
thegman20 wrote:what is the size of each modular?
For the first one you need 1:2 rectangles, the second one can be made with rectangle sizes varying from 1:1,5 to 1:2.
I hope you have fun with it. Halfway I lost enthusiasm, so I have a half finished swan standing on my table waiting to be finished...
Posted: August 4th, 2005, 11:26 pm
by thegman20
Thanks very much for the reply!
Although, I dont understand what 1:2 means... is that 1 inch wide 2 inch long?
Sorry for my stupidity, its just I usually measure in centimeters...
Posted: August 4th, 2005, 11:39 pm
by Joseph Wu
It's a proportion, not an absolute measure. You can use centimetres or inches or feet or miles or yards. As long as the length of the rectangle is twice the width, then it will work. In terms of finding a workable size, you'll need to experiment. I think that inches would be better than centimetres, in this case. (So if you want to convert to centimetres, it would be approximately 5 cm by 2.5 cm.)
Posted: August 5th, 2005, 12:32 am
by Friet
I used the instructions on opane.com for folding the swan.
I cut a bunch of a4 papers to get the paper. The long side in thirds and the short side in fourths. This way you get pieces of paper that are almost 2:1, (about 1,8:1 or 1,9:1) which is perfect for folding the triangles because it leaves a bit of room for error in the folding. And folding 500 triangles perfectly is rather difficult. The end result was about 30/40 cm high. You'll just have to find one of those paper cutting machines (like the ones they have in hobby stores) and cut a bunch of a4 papers at once. (50 is more then enough, and leaves you with extra papers in case you screw up)
[img]
http://www.student.tue.nl/p/i.d.kogel/merijn/zwaan1.jpg[/img]
Oh and another tip, fold the triangles while watching tv, otherwise you'll want to smash your head into the wall after you've folded a hundred of the little bastards.
Posted: August 5th, 2005, 5:06 am
by hunprat
I use the opane modular unit, it is simpler. You can see my version of the swan in my photo album. The size of the paper I use for each unit is from a 8.5" by 11" paper which I divided both horizontally and vertically by 4. So one sheet of paper will give you 16 units.
I also use this modular units and some modified units to make modular vases that I put my roses in. It seem that modular vases are the only vases that are heavy enough to support the weight of the roses, so as to not tip over.
Phu
Posted: August 6th, 2005, 10:57 am
by thegman20
Friet, after I do the first 5 rings, I dont get a stadium shape unless I squize
the model a bit, is that OK?
Posted: August 8th, 2005, 3:33 am
by wolf
thegman20 wrote:...I dont get a stadium shape unless I squize
the model a bit, is that OK?
For these modular units, you'll have to squeeze and stretch the model a lot to get all the units in. They'll have a tendency to pop out, especially if you use the thicker module units, but don't forget you can always use glue.

modular vase
Posted: August 15th, 2005, 8:14 am
by hunprat
Posted: August 15th, 2005, 11:58 am
by Friet
Ooohh, that vase looks really nice

Good job!
@ thegman20: Yeah, squeezing is the only way to get the model into shape.