Satoshi Kamiya - Ryu Zin (CP)

eric_son · Post by **eric_son** » September 30th, 2009, 3:07 am

Good luck. If he does reply, please do share.

to admins: Ooops! Sorry about the email address format. I forgot to post the email address using the correct format for preventing spambots. My bad.

insaneorigami · Post by **insaneorigami** » October 1st, 2009, 8:17 pm

Hmmm, I finally got around to sending a message yesterday, and still no response... Hmmm, well..

origamifreak_1.6180339889 · October 8th, 2009, 8:57 pm

i have a couple of questions about 3.5. first, what is the ratio from starting size to finished product? second, what is the grid for it? i counted 96 but i was going cross eyed trying count it. i really need answers asap please. im having a display at my local library in about 2 months

insaneorigami · Post by **insaneorigami** » October 8th, 2009, 10:20 pm

I thought that the grid was a 90/90, but I might be wrong... hmm... there are a couple of CP's out there that have many mistakes, such as the following:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/slipknotor ... 993323121/
Were you trying to fold from that? Because as Kafar was so kind to tell me, it has mistakes

BTW, still no response from that adress that I sent a message to... hmmm

Adam · Post by **Adam** » October 8th, 2009, 10:38 pm

The grid is 192x192, I believe

Zoraz · Post by **Zoraz** » October 8th, 2009, 11:40 pm

No, I'm pretty sure Origamifreak was right, I've heard many times that its based off a 96 grid. The scales may very well be based on 192nds though

StarPartener · Post by **StarPartener** » October 9th, 2009, 1:19 am

It is based off a 96 grid. Also, I am pretty sure that the scales are based off of a 192 grid. (double 96)

origamifreak_1.6180339889 · October 9th, 2009, 1:59 am

awesome. thanks

right now, im trying to decide what size paper to use so i really need that ratio

Zoraz · Post by **Zoraz** » October 9th, 2009, 2:07 am

I don't know the ratio, but the smallest I would go is 1 meter on each side. I heard somewhere that Kamiya used a 2m square, but that might be too unwieldy.

origamifreak_1.6180339889 · October 9th, 2009, 2:30 am

thanks. i might go with 4 feet so that the divisions are normal (1/96= 1/2 inch)

Kafar · Post by **Kafar** » October 9th, 2009, 8:20 am

Kamiya-san used 2mx2m, I'm going to fold it from 2,40mx2,40m, the finished model, fromt the ending tip of the tail to the tip of the jaw is 0,62 of the starting size, so from 2m it will have 1,24m, making it from 4feet sheet would be difficult when shaping the scales, unless you don't want to shape them as in 3,5 but as in 2,1

insaneorigami · Post by **insaneorigami** » October 9th, 2009, 6:15 pm

Good luck, Kafar... Have fun folding it

.

I think I might take a stab at 3.1 sometime soon.. ....when I have lots of free time
BTW, haven't seen you make any posts recently

Kafar · Post by **Kafar** » October 9th, 2009, 6:45 pm

I'm a little bit busy (studies, Ryu Jin preparations, etc..) and probably I'm going to be busy even more, when I start folding

insaneorigami · Post by **insaneorigami** » October 9th, 2009, 7:56 pm

Sounds like fun

. Anyway, like I said earlier, good luck with the 3,5 attempt.

And, as always, a ryu jin question from me

: How big of a piece of paper for a 3,1 attempt? 1.5/1.5M big enough?

Kafar · Post by **Kafar** » October 9th, 2009, 8:06 pm

If you are going to fold it without the scales(3,5 like) it's ok

the cp you have on flickr is wrong in the "scales on legs" part and the tail has different cp, satoshi never showed the whole cp for the 3,5 and any part for 3,1-it's just fan made cp