http://www.origami-usa.org/thefold001
Lang's Finch from "The Fold"
Forum rules
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
-
FrumiousBandersnatch
- Forum Sensei
- Posts: 736
- Joined: October 10th, 2007, 11:52 pm
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
-
PhillipORigami
- Junior Member
- Posts: 121
- Joined: August 27th, 2010, 4:33 am
- Location: Mars. For those people who take life seriously, CA.
-
FrumiousBandersnatch
- Forum Sensei
- Posts: 736
- Joined: October 10th, 2007, 11:52 pm
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Ah, that's what happens when you let computers construct them:)
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/51033679@N07/
-
cjbnc
- Junior Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:19 am
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
They're not the same model. In Lang's opus numbers:bethnor wrote:i was thinking about getting a subscription just to try this, but eyeballing it, it really looks close to his songbird I from ODS.
Finch = Opus 439
Songbird 1 = Opus 408
Songbird 2 = Opus 361
Apparently it was featured on this site as well, http://www.deckchairdreams.org/robert_lang.htm as discussed in this previous thread.
My Flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/cjbnc
-
FrumiousBandersnatch
- Forum Sensei
- Posts: 736
- Joined: October 10th, 2007, 11:52 pm
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Ugh, I love that the only photos anyone has gotten of this are super low resolution.
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/51033679@N07/
i apologize, as i was not clear. i don't believe that they're the same model, but the head, claw, and tail structure looks grossly the same, and i imagine the folding sequence is much the same as for the songbird I. the main difference is the wing structure, i.e., it appears to me a variation of songbird I. as frumious points out, that the pics are all so far away may be effecting my perception.
-
cjbnc
- Junior Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:19 am
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Here's my shot at it:

I like the pleated tail and the fullness of the body. I had a hard time with the shoulder crimp - the model is 3D at that point so it calls for a curved crimp that I just couldn't do well.
Songbird 1 looks different to me. It has real toes and lacks the tail pleats, at the least. I'll have to fold it and compare.

I like the pleated tail and the fullness of the body. I had a hard time with the shoulder crimp - the model is 3D at that point so it calls for a curved crimp that I just couldn't do well.
Songbird 1 looks different to me. It has real toes and lacks the tail pleats, at the least. I'll have to fold it and compare.
My Flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/cjbnc
-
cjbnc
- Junior Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:19 am
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
My fold of Songbird 1:

Differences:
- S1 is a bird base with grafted toes, Finch base is designed for the 3D body and pleated tail IMHO
- S1 has toes, Finch does not. leg shaping is very similar otherwise
- S1 wings are just crimped out of the tail flap. Finch has individual wing flaps although they are not completely loose
- heads are shaped similarly, but the beaks themselves are different
- S1 spent most of the plan folding out those toes. Finch spent more time on precreasing and pleating the tail.
If you need more resolution, Flickr has both of them a bit larger.

Differences:
- S1 is a bird base with grafted toes, Finch base is designed for the 3D body and pleated tail IMHO
- S1 has toes, Finch does not. leg shaping is very similar otherwise
- S1 wings are just crimped out of the tail flap. Finch has individual wing flaps although they are not completely loose
- heads are shaped similarly, but the beaks themselves are different
- S1 spent most of the plan folding out those toes. Finch spent more time on precreasing and pleating the tail.
If you need more resolution, Flickr has both of them a bit larger.
My Flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/cjbnc