Lang's Finch from "The Fold"

General discussion about Origami, Papers, Diagramming, ...
Post Reply
FrumiousBandersnatch
Forum Sensei
Posts: 736
Joined: October 10th, 2007, 11:52 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Lang's Finch from "The Fold"

Post by FrumiousBandersnatch »

Wondering if anyone has folded this model yet?


Image


http://www.origami-usa.org/thefold001
PhillipORigami
Junior Member
Posts: 121
Joined: August 27th, 2010, 4:33 am
Location: Mars. For those people who take life seriously, CA.

Post by PhillipORigami »

I have, Its awesome. Try it
E=mc^2- Exellence= MC on a square

...or CMC....
bethnor
Buddha
Posts: 1341
Joined: August 17th, 2006, 9:57 pm

Post by bethnor »

i was thinking about getting a subscription just to try this, but eyeballing it, it really looks close to his songbird I from ODS.

also, i have to confess, though the final result usually looks good, i usually detest lang's folding sequences.
FrumiousBandersnatch
Forum Sensei
Posts: 736
Joined: October 10th, 2007, 11:52 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by FrumiousBandersnatch »

Ah, that's what happens when you let computers construct them:)
andssl
Super Member
Posts: 188
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 7:12 pm

Post by andssl »

Bethnor, I have the same feeling....I have ODS, but folding sequence has driven me out of this book.
cjbnc
Junior Member
Posts: 75
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:19 am
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Post by cjbnc »

bethnor wrote:i was thinking about getting a subscription just to try this, but eyeballing it, it really looks close to his songbird I from ODS.
They're not the same model. In Lang's opus numbers:
Finch = Opus 439
Songbird 1 = Opus 408
Songbird 2 = Opus 361

Apparently it was featured on this site as well, http://www.deckchairdreams.org/robert_lang.htm as discussed in this previous thread.
FrumiousBandersnatch
Forum Sensei
Posts: 736
Joined: October 10th, 2007, 11:52 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Post by FrumiousBandersnatch »

Ugh, I love that the only photos anyone has gotten of this are super low resolution.
bethnor
Buddha
Posts: 1341
Joined: August 17th, 2006, 9:57 pm

Post by bethnor »

i apologize, as i was not clear. i don't believe that they're the same model, but the head, claw, and tail structure looks grossly the same, and i imagine the folding sequence is much the same as for the songbird I. the main difference is the wing structure, i.e., it appears to me a variation of songbird I. as frumious points out, that the pics are all so far away may be effecting my perception.
cjbnc
Junior Member
Posts: 75
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:19 am
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Post by cjbnc »

Here's my shot at it:
Image

I like the pleated tail and the fullness of the body. I had a hard time with the shoulder crimp - the model is 3D at that point so it calls for a curved crimp that I just couldn't do well.

Songbird 1 looks different to me. It has real toes and lacks the tail pleats, at the least. I'll have to fold it and compare.
bethnor
Buddha
Posts: 1341
Joined: August 17th, 2006, 9:57 pm

Post by bethnor »

now that i can see a close up, i can see the finch doesn't have individual talons. feels funny calling a small bird's toes talons...
cjbnc
Junior Member
Posts: 75
Joined: December 21st, 2010, 1:19 am
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Post by cjbnc »

My fold of Songbird 1:
Image

Differences:
- S1 is a bird base with grafted toes, Finch base is designed for the 3D body and pleated tail IMHO
- S1 has toes, Finch does not. leg shaping is very similar otherwise
- S1 wings are just crimped out of the tail flap. Finch has individual wing flaps although they are not completely loose
- heads are shaped similarly, but the beaks themselves are different
- S1 spent most of the plan folding out those toes. Finch spent more time on precreasing and pleating the tail.

If you need more resolution, Flickr has both of them a bit larger.
Post Reply