Worst Origami Fold?
Forum rules
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 62
- Joined: April 14th, 2005, 2:30 am
- Location: United States, Missouri
After several abortive attempts at Lang's praying mantis, I've grown to loathe sinks. I must have torn a ream of paper over that one.
Other than that, the only one that irritates me is guesswork. I can divide into thirds or fifths far easier than I could "Fold to about here". What really sets my teeth on edge is that guesswork like that ruins the precision of the model.
Other than that, the only one that irritates me is guesswork. I can divide into thirds or fifths far easier than I could "Fold to about here". What really sets my teeth on edge is that guesswork like that ruins the precision of the model.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 62
- Joined: April 14th, 2005, 2:30 am
- Location: United States, Missouri
Please don't misunderstand me. I have no problem with folds that are off center, but measurably so. It's the approximations, like montrell's kangaroo; specific fold patterns with no landmarks.
I know that a certain someone formalized those particular "guestimations" with the appropriate landmarks...
I know that a certain someone formalized those particular "guestimations" with the appropriate landmarks...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 443
- Joined: April 18th, 2005, 7:27 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Credit where credit is due: I found the crease patterns for those constructions in an old Origami Tanteidan newsletter (before they did magazines) and drew up diagrams for them.
But back to Yoshizawa, there are many of his models that rely on folds without landmarks. It takes time and effort to practice his models to be able to get them right. And, somehow, he still does them better than anyone else.
But back to Yoshizawa, there are many of his models that rely on folds without landmarks. It takes time and effort to practice his models to be able to get them right. And, somehow, he still does them better than anyone else.
Today I started folding the modular swan thats floating around all over the internet . (http://www.opane.com/swan.html <-- that one)
The first six steps were simple as flying monkey balls, but then it continues with the worst step ever.
Repeat 499 times.......
I've been busy all afternoon, and I'm only at 200.
*edit* I'm at 300 now. My fingers hurt
The first six steps were simple as flying monkey balls, but then it continues with the worst step ever.
Repeat 499 times.......
I've been busy all afternoon, and I'm only at 200.
*edit* I'm at 300 now. My fingers hurt

-
- Newbie
- Posts: 39
- Joined: May 13th, 2005, 2:10 am
- Location: Portland, OR
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 113
- Joined: June 7th, 2005, 1:30 pm
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 425
- Joined: April 27th, 2003, 1:28 am
- Location: Rock n robot!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 425
- Joined: April 27th, 2003, 1:28 am
- Location: Rock n robot!
- FunkeeFolder
- Junior Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: June 7th, 2005, 6:19 pm
- Location: USA, Texas
Pleats and the like have to be my worst enemy. Those little buggers just get kinda confusing after awhile, but odd ratios are a pain too! Though I must say that there is one model that is fun to do and almost tottaly consists of pleats and crimps. Stephen Weiss's Woodland Elf! I love this model!
Edit: Also grids are horribly torturous, but you feel really good when you make one and can say to yourself. Hey self I just made a horribly torturous grid so boo ya!
Edit: Also grids are horribly torturous, but you feel really good when you make one and can say to yourself. Hey self I just made a horribly torturous grid so boo ya!

-
- Newbie
- Posts: 39
- Joined: May 13th, 2005, 2:10 am
- Location: Portland, OR