RollerCoasterBug wrote: It could also be my experience in using the foil so much, I've learned how to easily reverse crease a crease on foil.
rollercoaster, it seems to me you're not even reading your own posts.
i have used tissue foil before and there is NO WAY it is as easy to reverse as kami.
again:
to make tissue foil, you first must have a large, open, well-aerated space. not everyone has this. certainly, there are those who use glue, which alleviates this problem. but the ratio of glue:water is not exact, and there will be some trial/error involved.
you must also have a means to cut a large square. not everyone has this. further, to make a larger square, you have to cut four individual squares to combine them. not a big deal, but again, more work.
after you make the foil, you have to wait until the next day before you use it. again, some people get away with using a blow dryer but not everyone does this.
if you make a mistake mid-way through the model, all this work is now ruined! and you have to wait another day before you can try again (assuming you don't wish to blow dry or make tissue foil en masse like anne has). and given that this thread is > 40 pages, some people are not maesters of origami like you and occasionally mess this model up!
i folded for years and i avoided taping squares together as nolan suggested in his book--dunno why. tried it, and you can do it in less than 5 minutes. if you mess up, you can scrap it, and try again. if you mess up again, it's no big deal, scrap it and make another sheet. you can try as many times as you like in one day (limited only by how many squares you have), no problem.
there is no comparison and stop pretending like there is. think before you get "mad" for people speaking about the
well known properties of tissue foil.
, because of your push downs on foil. 
I hand make my foil, and that's probaply why it can be reverse creased, easily doing many manuvered sinks. 
Who ever brought up the point on the smallest Ancient dragon being of a sport, I agree. The Ancient dragon isn't to be taken as a sport, It's (acording to Satoshi himself), a "learning experience." The smaller you make the paper, the more it doesn't look like a decent dragon. 
Although I have seen some preety good miniature dragons on this post, mainly the red one in someone's hand (sorry, I can't see past this page on the scroll 
) about the size of their thumb. That one looks very decent. 
But to make a very observable dragon, that many people will admire, you need to go larger, and take your time, it looks way cooler if you do so. I've done this dragon 9 times, one of which was 30x30, I wouldn't go under 40-45cm, going less than that is a dare that doesn't have a nice outcome. 
