Copyright question
Forum rules
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 5
- Joined: March 13th, 2009, 10:25 pm
Copyright question
What, if any, legal issues surround the creation of an origami version of copyrighted material? (for example, origami versions of anime characters)
I am pretty sure that it is legal to design and fold them, having seen several examples, but are there any less obvious issues?
Specifically, I am in the process of developing a model based off of Darkrai from nintendo's pokemon games.
I am pretty sure that it is legal to design and fold them, having seen several examples, but are there any less obvious issues?
Specifically, I am in the process of developing a model based off of Darkrai from nintendo's pokemon games.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 5
- Joined: March 13th, 2009, 10:25 pm
- Sara
- Senior Member
- Posts: 285
- Joined: January 25th, 2008, 9:18 am
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Contact:
Two examples
Well, the first two models that pop up in my mind are:
1. Spenjurmunni by Robert J. Lang (Pokemon)
2. Yellow Bird by Satoshi Kamiya (Chocobo)
Why? Because both resemble known characters, but were given a different name. I'm not sure about the motivation Robert Lang had. However, I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that Kamiya-san did so because of fear of copyright infringement. Iin his book Kamiya-san does quite obviously state that it is meant to be a chocobo, but he doesn't spell it out (ie instead of Final Fantasy just says popular video game, and never mentions the word chocobo).
I think you're probably safe to design models inspired by any existing characters, but if you're publishing you might have restrictions on what you may call the model.
On the other hand, there are lots of designs that are named after the characters they resemble. There's quite a few examples by Robin Glynn (http://glynnorigami.co.uk). There are also some designers that concentrate on replicating ships etc from well-known series. It might make a difference whether you publish your designs in a book, and how well known you are as a designer in general. Robert Lang, for example, is probably the origami designer that has the most media attention more recently, and Kamiya-san published diagrams for the "Yellow Bird" in his book.
-- Sara
1. Spenjurmunni by Robert J. Lang (Pokemon)
2. Yellow Bird by Satoshi Kamiya (Chocobo)
Why? Because both resemble known characters, but were given a different name. I'm not sure about the motivation Robert Lang had. However, I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that Kamiya-san did so because of fear of copyright infringement. Iin his book Kamiya-san does quite obviously state that it is meant to be a chocobo, but he doesn't spell it out (ie instead of Final Fantasy just says popular video game, and never mentions the word chocobo).
I think you're probably safe to design models inspired by any existing characters, but if you're publishing you might have restrictions on what you may call the model.
On the other hand, there are lots of designs that are named after the characters they resemble. There's quite a few examples by Robin Glynn (http://glynnorigami.co.uk). There are also some designers that concentrate on replicating ships etc from well-known series. It might make a difference whether you publish your designs in a book, and how well known you are as a designer in general. Robert Lang, for example, is probably the origami designer that has the most media attention more recently, and Kamiya-san published diagrams for the "Yellow Bird" in his book.
-- Sara
I would also point out that regardless, it's not worth the copyright holder's time to go after you unless you're actually making money with it, or distributing it widely.
IMHO you should design your own subjects though-- it's more creative, and then you never have to worry about copyright infringement.
IMHO you should design your own subjects though-- it's more creative, and then you never have to worry about copyright infringement.
- origamimasterjared
- Buddha
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
- Contact:
You haven't seen Mickey Mouse because it's hard. Actually, I know of one, but it's not very good.
ET just means extra terrestrial. Jun Maekawa's design hardly looks like the movie character.
Other examples of origami characters with their names changed: Satoshi Kamiya's "Divine Dragon", "Wizard", "Inoshishigami" were all changed for the book. Jeremy Shafer's "Familiar Starship". All the pokémon stuff in the Tanteidan convention books has been renamed, "Burning Anteater", "The North Wind", "Reptile with a Bulb on its Back", etc.
"Halle" doesn't use his real name in his books of Cartoon Origami.
In fact, as far as I know, there are no published books featuring copyrighted characters where both the author and designs have their proper names., where the author has not first gotten the blessing of the character owner. Some Star Trek and Star Wars stuff comes to mind). Tanteidan doesn't count in that it's a compilation of submissions, not a regular book.
ET just means extra terrestrial. Jun Maekawa's design hardly looks like the movie character.
Other examples of origami characters with their names changed: Satoshi Kamiya's "Divine Dragon", "Wizard", "Inoshishigami" were all changed for the book. Jeremy Shafer's "Familiar Starship". All the pokémon stuff in the Tanteidan convention books has been renamed, "Burning Anteater", "The North Wind", "Reptile with a Bulb on its Back", etc.
"Halle" doesn't use his real name in his books of Cartoon Origami.
In fact, as far as I know, there are no published books featuring copyrighted characters where both the author and designs have their proper names., where the author has not first gotten the blessing of the character owner. Some Star Trek and Star Wars stuff comes to mind). Tanteidan doesn't count in that it's a compilation of submissions, not a regular book.
I saw a Mickey Mouse at the Gallery House in Japan. It was really good - made by Kamiya, but from multiple sheets (all black and white though). I think 3-4 sheets in all.
From all the things I saw there, the Mickey Mouse was the one that cought my eye (not Ryuzin 3.5). It was small and on the bottom of a shelf somewhere.
Last year I asked Kamiya if he was going to work on it again, but he didnt look too fussed about it.
From all the things I saw there, the Mickey Mouse was the one that cought my eye (not Ryuzin 3.5). It was small and on the bottom of a shelf somewhere.
Last year I asked Kamiya if he was going to work on it again, but he didnt look too fussed about it.
My flickr album: http://www.flickr.com/photos/12043525@N04/
Re: Two examples
I think his motivation was to be cleverSara wrote:Well, the first two models that pop up in my mind are:
1. Spenjurmunni by Robert J. Lang (Pokemon)
2. Yellow Bird by Satoshi Kamiya (Chocobo)
Why? Because both resemble known characters, but were given a different name. I'm not sure about the motivation Robert Lang had.
This may be so, but don't make any assumptions. Many years ago, Jeff Beynon designed a stylised "head of batman" - out of courtesy, he sent it to DC comics for comment. In return he received a seriously heavyweight letter from their lawyers *strongly* forbidding any such use of their copyrighted material.
So, whilst folders may get away with it and it may seem innocent fun, they will fall on you like a ton of kami if they choose to.
So, whilst folders may get away with it and it may seem innocent fun, they will fall on you like a ton of kami if they choose to.
- Ondrej.Cibulka
- Buddha
- Posts: 1055
- Joined: January 9th, 2006, 4:18 pm
- Location: Czech republic
- Contact:
I agree with Nick. My experience is so that me (or you) as a designer and folder and propagator etc. must be very carefull to use anything. We had (among many others) some problem, absolutely incomprehensible to us, with one of you... But, luckily, many of you are very kind people! Thank you very much!
Ondrej Cibulka Origami, www.origamido.cz
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 425
- Joined: April 27th, 2003, 1:28 am
- Location: Rock n robot!