Rubiks cube
Forum rules
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
- Daydreamer
- Moderator
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: October 28th, 2005, 2:53 pm
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
4x4x4 = Rubik's Revenge
5x5x5 = Professor's Cube
With the 4x4x4 I'm down to an average of about 7-8 minutes, my best being somewhere just above the 5 minute limit.
I haven't stopped my 5x5x5 time yet but it should be somewhere between 10-15 minutes.
As for the 3x3x3 I don't know since I don't have one, but since solving the larger cubes involves solving the 3x3x3 in the end (at least with the method I use) it's definitely below 5 minutes.
5x5x5 = Professor's Cube
With the 4x4x4 I'm down to an average of about 7-8 minutes, my best being somewhere just above the 5 minute limit.
I haven't stopped my 5x5x5 time yet but it should be somewhere between 10-15 minutes.
As for the 3x3x3 I don't know since I don't have one, but since solving the larger cubes involves solving the 3x3x3 in the end (at least with the method I use) it's definitely below 5 minutes.
So long and keep folding ^_^
Gerwin
Gerwin
- angrydemon
- Forum Sensei
- Posts: 556
- Joined: March 21st, 2008, 5:12 pm
- Location: bottomless pits of hell
- Contact:
i don't think it works, haha
i can do it a little above 1 min...![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
i can do it a little above 1 min...
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
OrigamiTube.com - Watch, Fold, and Show Off!
- origami street racer
- Super Member
- Posts: 188
- Joined: June 8th, 2008, 5:08 pm
- Location: some where
- angrydemon
- Forum Sensei
- Posts: 556
- Joined: March 21st, 2008, 5:12 pm
- Location: bottomless pits of hell
- Contact:
I once saw one of the seniors in my school finish it in 30 seconds.
I've fallen down, and I can't get up.
My Flickr
My Flickr
there's actually a method to do this, you CAN if you want to randomly switch it, but look for the method, it's for sure can help you solve it every time. i'm striving for that 30 seconds...just gotta learn a new method =)origami street racer wrote:It is taking me years and I am still working on it
OrigamiTube.com - Watch, Fold, and Show Off!
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
The fastest time recorded is about an average 20 seconds, and my average time is now 15 minutes! With an instruction book..
Last edited by klnothincomin on August 4th, 2008, 1:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kevin Luo
If practice doesn't make perfect, at least it passes time! ^_^
If practice doesn't make perfect, at least it passes time! ^_^
-
- Super Member
- Posts: 207
- Joined: February 22nd, 2008, 5:36 pm
- Location: A para-dimensional warp in space-time. Otherwise known as the Homsar Reservation.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: July 2nd, 2008, 12:12 am
- Location: i have no idea....
'sup. hi, um, i've been solving the rubiks cube for a little under a month, and i'm 10 years old, and i can solve the rubiks cube with an average of about 1 min. 15 sec., however my personal best is 54.78 seconds. what do you guys think? but really, i think you guys are being sarcastic, i mean, to learn the BEGINNER method, you only need to dedicate 100% of you time and work nonstop and be pretty smart, then you'll be fine, though that process would probably take, oh, i don't know, one week, at the slowest?
JK! (kind of.....)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
i know what this looks like, but it isn't what it seems........... i think.
After some years trying to solve it for a month, then I forget it for a couple of years, and so on... I can solve almost it
... I always get the entire cube solved but two pieces
... And I can´t swap them without mixing the rest of the colors again ![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
The algorithms that I find on the internet doesn´t works at all![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
The algorithms that I find on the internet doesn´t works at all
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
"Keep On Folding!!"
![Image](http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/3977/gmailjuanjovegatt0.png)
![Image](http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/3977/gmailjuanjovegatt0.png)
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
- unknownfolder
- Super Member
- Posts: 174
- Joined: May 23rd, 2008, 3:12 pm
- Location: United States
The algorithms on the net are all written in code that varies between authors. Really once you learn the code all you have to do is memorize it. After that it actually almost becomes second nature for your hands to do certain turns and twists.
I have solved a 4x4 cube in 15 minutes. I could do it faster but I am way too distracted.
The real problem I have is the way I solve the 4x4. There is another way that is much more efficient and eliminates parity errors. In order to solve these parity errors I had to memorize a very long algorithm- r2,B2,U2,l,U2,ri,U2,r,U2,F2,r,F2li,B2,r2. I have my methods for memorization so it only took me about four days or so. There is another algorithm but I do not feel like writing it at the moment.
I have solved a 4x4 cube in 15 minutes. I could do it faster but I am way too distracted.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Whenever I do complex Origami I get this sinking feeling.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: September 22nd, 2009, 11:46 pm