Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Friendly design and folding competitions.
User avatar
PauliusOrigami
Forum Sensei
Posts: 781
Joined: July 15th, 2009, 9:30 pm
Location: Lithuania, Vilnius
Contact:

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by PauliusOrigami »

Razzmatazz wrote:Determining if it is flat fold-able via Maekawa's and Kawasaki's theorem has been disproven. However it is a good general rule.
Could you give me a reference (source)?
My flickr gallery. Come to visit and leave feedback.
User avatar
Razzmatazz
Forum Sensei
Posts: 892
Joined: March 20th, 2009, 6:25 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by Razzmatazz »

Apparently the proof is in this document: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=313852.313918

But it is in the wikipedia article for Kawasaki's theorem here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawasaki%27s_theorem
User avatar
Kafar
Forum Sensei
Posts: 585
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 8:48 am
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by Kafar »

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
GWB origami
Forum Sensei
Posts: 836
Joined: February 12th, 2012, 9:20 pm
Location: somewhere in the evil netherworld riding a giant, three headed tarantula
Contact:

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by GWB origami »

Thanks for fixing it, Kafar! Can I post it on my website?
User avatar
Kafar
Forum Sensei
Posts: 585
Joined: June 15th, 2008, 8:48 am
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by Kafar »

no problem, yes you can
Image
Image
User avatar
Razzmatazz
Forum Sensei
Posts: 892
Joined: March 20th, 2009, 6:25 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by Razzmatazz »

PauliusOrigami wrote:Could you give me a reference (source)?
Also: http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=313 ... N=39024271
User avatar
rgieseking
Junior Member
Posts: 93
Joined: January 3rd, 2013, 12:01 am
Contact:

Re: Fairy Archer CP Challenge!

Post by rgieseking »

PauliusOrigami wrote:
Razzmatazz wrote:Determining if it is flat fold-able via Maekawa's and Kawasaki's theorem has been disproven. However it is a good general rule.
Could you give me a reference (source)?
My understanding is that Maekawa's theorem and Kawasaki's theorem just tell you whether each vertex individually is flat-foldable or not. You can't have a flat-foldable crease pattern without satisfying both theorems at every vertex.

But just satisfying the theorems doesn't necessarily mean that the CP will be flat-foldable. Actually figuring out mathematically whether a CP is flat-foldable is much more complicated, not something that can be put into a simple set of rules.
Post Reply