The Origami Forum

@AKB - Yours does look pretty good.

I think your paper is thicker than Artur's, and with thinner paper, you may be able to shape the toes and the head better. Also, with a little 'damp' folding at the end, you may be able to close and shape the tail a little more precisely.

- Hank Simon

i know were the cp but i dont know it its legal if i post here or the pic

I folded the base and took some pictures if anyone wants pm me

Wow, artur! your fold is great! Maybe one day I will be as good as you.

finally i have folded a good one
paper:38 cm kraft
final length: 27 cm
designer:Satoshi Kamiya
time to fold: a few houres

Here is my new version. I fixed the legs and body.

looks good exept try raising the tail and using slightly biggher paper
by the way i am about to refold this over next few days and will try to be as much help to anyone as i can

I will refold it with bigger and thinner paper sometime. I need a break from this model before I fold it again though.

They both look awesome!

Thanks joshua! Have you folded this model?

Nope. Satoshi's tanuki is as complex as i've gone so far...
This one looks a tad to difficult for me - But i'll definatly make one when the diagrams are published!

Any news about diagrams publishing?

none whatsoever..or at least i couldnt find anything.....i wouldnt hold your breath

i guess i'll never understand. shuki kato's beautiful spinosaurus is available for free, and it's plain as day to my untrained eye that kamiya's, adam tran's, and kato's spinosauruses are all very similar in design. seems pointless to pine for kamiya's.

bethnor i dont get what you have against kamiya. i know most people who are new to origami really try to focus on kamiyas models and i get it because they are awesome. the designers you mentioned also have very nice spinosauruses but i think most people just dont really know about them and if they do they want to fold kamiyas because they like it better. your making satoshi kamiya models seem like a bad thing and they're not.