Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Forum rules
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Water Dragon by Brian Chan or Ryujin 1.2 by Satoshi Kamiya?
I really like the look of the long skinny dragon in both of these models, but I am wondering which one I should try first. I honestly have a feeling that I am biting off more than I can chew with either, but you never know til you try right?
Thanks for any input.
I really like the look of the long skinny dragon in both of these models, but I am wondering which one I should try first. I honestly have a feeling that I am biting off more than I can chew with either, but you never know til you try right?
Thanks for any input.
- Razzmatazz
- Forum Sensei
- Posts: 892
- Joined: March 20th, 2009, 6:25 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
If I remember correctly, the water dragon has an easier head, but harder body. The head for Ryu Jin 1.2 was fiddly for me and I couldn't do it. But the rest was easier.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: December 25th, 2011, 7:15 pm
- Location: Inside my twisted mind....
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
If you don't let the asymmetry screw you up, the Water Dragon.
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Maybe Brian Chan's Newt first - seams easier and similar...
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Water dragon being 2 stretched bird bases whit 2 grafts, it easier to understand and find a folding sequence. Kamiya's models tends to be a little more complex in their structure.
Water dragons is easier because the base is made of already known bases.
Water dragons is easier because the base is made of already known bases.
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
But Kamiya's is slightly easier, because it lies on a grid.
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
I disagree, the fact that it is 2 bird bases makes it faster to precrease and the structure becomes more apparent in designs like brian's water dragon when it is not based on a grid. also it is easier to collapse as generally it will have more of a folding sequence than models that are based on a grid! 

my flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/69530881@N02/
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/yevgennahirna
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/yevgennahirna
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Models based on a grid have a folding sequence, it's just harder to find. 

Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
some - yes, but not all take for example andrey ermakov's mantis shrimp. it is diagramed as a guided collapse rather than diagrams so there is no real folding sequence also the ryujin is pretty chaotic even though there is a basic order in which you must fold (belly pleats then legs then transition units then scales and so on)
my flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/69530881@N02/
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/yevgennahirna
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/yevgennahirna
- Swapnil Das
- Buddha
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: July 29th, 2013, 4:39 pm
- Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Contact:
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
It's 32.cowburger13 wrote:What is the grid for the water dragon?


- Benlewisorigami
- Senior Member
- Posts: 479
- Joined: November 9th, 2012, 10:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Eh, but Justin, it wasn't designed on a grid. It's a basic base with sinks in certain areas to narrow them down... It's bird bases, and other bases like the fish base for instance that make up the base
I would rather fail trying than fail without trying....
My flickr :D http://www.flickr.com/photos/89213771@N06/
My flickr :D http://www.flickr.com/photos/89213771@N06/
- Swapnil Das
- Buddha
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: July 29th, 2013, 4:39 pm
- Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Contact:
Re: Which CP is easier to fold / collapse
Here's My Fold! -> http://www.flickr.com/photos/dipakcdas/9447077213/
ANd It's From A Perfect Grid Of 32.
ANd It's From A Perfect Grid Of 32.