Phoenix diagram

Need help with folding a model? Ask here.
Post Reply
azuremilk17
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: April 14th, 2007, 1:59 am

Phoenix diagram

Post by azuremilk17 »

I heard phoenix 3.0 diagram is existed.

Edited by moderator
User avatar
Joe the white
Senior Member
Posts: 456
Joined: May 17th, 2003, 2:51 pm

Post by Joe the white »

azuremilk17
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: April 14th, 2007, 1:59 am

it hasn't copyright

Post by azuremilk17 »

phoenix 3.0 diagram is written by someone..

it's public like beetle diagram in board.

someone only look cp, he wrote diagram.

and my member find diagram in website

address : http://blog.naver.com/jojo_02/80036473368

it's amazing
User avatar
Rdude
Senior Member
Posts: 292
Joined: August 31st, 2005, 5:50 am

Post by Rdude »

Hmmm... Interesting, but is it actually available?
If you can't fold it, try a bazooka.
My Flickr ->
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rdudevr55/
User avatar
origamimasterjared
Buddha
Posts: 1670
Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
Contact:

Post by origamimasterjared »

First off, don't say "It hasn't copyright".

It's not by Satoshi Kamiya--that does not make it allowed. Diagramming someone else's work is okay, as long as it's just for personal use. Once you start distributing the diagrams, you really need to ask permission from the creator. Distributing such diagrams you are depriving the creator of a few things: the right to not have a piece diagrammed, the right to have it done in their own way, the reaction if/when the creator finally releases his own diagrams.

Your comparison to the "diagrams" made for some of the other CPs on his site, such as the Caucasus Beetle that I made or the Hercules Beetle that Anermak made is faulty. See, we did not diagram the beetles. We showed how to find all the creases in the crease pattern. Even this is kind of sketchy, but not too bad.

Oh, and those Phoenix diagrams are wrong. The reference point they give is just (1/9,1/9)=(.111111,.111111) when they should give ((2√2)-2)/[((2√2)-2)+2+2+1+√2]=> (.114382,.114382). It's close, but if you use a large enough square, there will be considerable error.

If you can find my crease pattern diagram online (which was distributed years ago without my permission), it will give you the correct points.
kingdomwinds
Super Member
Posts: 132
Joined: December 19th, 2006, 3:57 pm

Post by kingdomwinds »

the diagrams do exist somewhere online.
User avatar
giriniss
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: April 3rd, 2007, 11:37 am
Location: Lithuania

Post by giriniss »

where?
i lost my grammar
rockmanex6
Senior Member
Posts: 425
Joined: April 27th, 2003, 1:28 am
Location: Rock n robot!

Post by rockmanex6 »

I fold these folds, but didnt knew it was wrong ref, how I can the right one plus fold method to right one I can see?

>>>>>>>>>> The reference point they give is just (1/9,1/9)=(.111111,.111111) when they should give ((2√2)-2)/[((2√2)-2)+2+2+1+√2]=> (.114382,.114382). It's close, but if you use a large enough square, there will be considerable error.
User avatar
origamimasterjared
Buddha
Posts: 1670
Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
Contact:

Post by origamimasterjared »

rockmanex6 wrote:I fold these folds, but didnt knew it was wrong ref, how I can the right one plus fold method to right one I can see?

>>>>>>>>>> The reference point they give is just (1/9,1/9)=(.111111,.111111) when they should give ((2√2)-2)/[((2√2)-2)+2+2+1+√2]=> (.114382,.114382). It's close, but if you use a large enough square, there will be considerable error.
It's all over the web. Also, searching this forum will get you the verbal instructions.
Post Reply