Satoshi Kamiya - Phoenix
Forum rules
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
READ: The Origami Forum Rules & Regulations
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: January 13th, 2008, 7:03 pm
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
Here is my photos of my very first attemp of folding Kamiya's Phoenix 3.5! You can find them here in my flicr account:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23692423@N ... 945414419/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23692423@N ... 945414419/
Kevin Luo
If practice doesn't make perfect, at least it passes time! ^_^
If practice doesn't make perfect, at least it passes time! ^_^
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
- quesoonfire
- Super Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: August 20th, 2007, 2:52 am
- Location: by the computer....
- Contact:
- klnothincomin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 256
- Joined: February 12th, 2008, 2:06 am
- Location: Alpharetta, GA
- Contact:
- origamimasterjared
- Buddha
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
- Contact:
Have you seen Komatsu's diagrams for Maekawa's Devil (Tanteidan 56)? Or Miyajima's for Yoshino's FA-18?klnothincomin wrote:If it is not made by Kamiya, I don't think it is accurate, only the creator can diagram a model correctly if he made it.
If it's the one I'm thinking of, no it's not. The steps at the beginning don't even give the correct reference points.its accurate, a friend gave it to me
- origamimasterjared
- Buddha
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: August 13th, 2004, 6:25 pm
- Contact:
You're talking about 3.0, right?
Does it start by finding a 1/9 reference point? If so then it's incorrect. The proportions are supposed to be (2√2)-2:2:2:1+√2. 1/9 is relatively close, and is a decent approximation, but it's not accurate. Search this forum and I have diagrammed the proper reference point. The rest of the diagrams do a decent job at collapsing the CP as I recall. The wing part is for the most part trash though. Try to figure it out based on pictures by Artur Biernacki or klnothincomin. They got it pretty spot on. I think rdrutel's video does a very good job at uncovering the mechanics of the wing feathers. He got the tips right anyhow.
If you're talking about version 3.5, the diagram does an excellent job at solving the base, but once again fails in the finishing.
Does it start by finding a 1/9 reference point? If so then it's incorrect. The proportions are supposed to be (2√2)-2:2:2:1+√2. 1/9 is relatively close, and is a decent approximation, but it's not accurate. Search this forum and I have diagrammed the proper reference point. The rest of the diagrams do a decent job at collapsing the CP as I recall. The wing part is for the most part trash though. Try to figure it out based on pictures by Artur Biernacki or klnothincomin. They got it pretty spot on. I think rdrutel's video does a very good job at uncovering the mechanics of the wing feathers. He got the tips right anyhow.
If you're talking about version 3.5, the diagram does an excellent job at solving the base, but once again fails in the finishing.